T3TRA Lunar_Station
Many argue that in aid of long term survival and preservation of
biodiversity (Homo sapiens et al. species) it is fundamental that we spread to
other planets. However, what is clear is that space exploration is conducive to
research which will apply to conditions of the planet Earth. As we head into
local unstable climate, the investigations will inform the resolve to extreme
weather conditions such as floods, cold, heat waves, hurricanes, earthquakes
and desertification phenomena, as well as help us understand how to manage the
finite resources such as water. In addition to the pragmatic, the discovered
data and celestial samples (fossils & fragments) will contribute to our
comprehension of the tangible – physical and the observable – quantifiable theoretical
truths. There is potential for the information we discover to help reveal the
formation of the Solar System and indeed planet Earth.
Human intervention is necessary but
it has to be in equilibrium with Nature. We have identified that as a minimum
default we must be efficient, self-sufficient, coexist within the closed loop
system(s), and allow ourselves to evolve. Our technology must be reusable with
no singular use. Sustainability is a passive and durable method that supports
biodiversity but is it enough?
We have observed that while we need
to consume matter to generate energy in order to survive, it is precisely
because of this awareness that it is our responsible duty to conduct strategies
which inject energy back into the ecosystem that is conducive to life – as
demonstrated by other species.
We must produce responsive
architecture. That adapts to the variable conditions set by the Space context.
Generate micro climates that humans can inhabit and grow genetically modified
organisms for consumption and other energy applications as well as harvest
water. Thus to continue the quest of space exploration, is to strive toward
profound innovation.
Whilst colonisation implies
permanence, surviving in deep space is more practical in short segments of time
due to the natural – biological condition of the human body.
NASA research indicates that with
long enough exposure to a micro gravity environment the human body begins to
adapt to the climate of Space. However for the human body to evolve to a self
sufficient, healthy and safe state without bone loss, muscle atrophy,
cardiovascular issues (physiological to psychological), that is to say;
independent of reliance on technology, would take extensive amount of time.
Life Sciences
Data Archive (LSDA)
Additional concern is the high
probability of contamination and to ensure we preserve the natural integrity of
Space and in this context, the Moon. These reasons drive the logic of the
proposal; a lightweight – responsive – mobile/temporary – modular structural
solution. We must generate the minimum required to sustain life and minimise
reliance on the physical material. The digital platform is to provide the
necessary stimulation and support.
The recreation of the iconic view
of Earth from the Moon is intended to remind us of the original 1968 photograph
which represents a shift of focus by inspiring ideas such as the “no boarders”
movements. Rather than self-destruction people became concerned with the planet
Earth as a whole; medicine, clean air/water for all, biodiversity and
environmental protection – such is the aspiration.
The theory is that by “wearing architecture” (a digital
computer/workstation and life support suit) we purge the material dependence.
Remove reliance on extensive, mega-structured human built environment and
objects in physical terms. The suit can be designed to feed stimulating signals
through the senses to the brain which trigger memories and developed constructs
by the brain which it then stitches together and creates a vivid (artificial)
experience. This way you only have to train the brain in parallel with the suit
and thus reduce requirement of excessive resource consumption. For example, for
the first time but not the last, you hold a physical ball, you squeeze it and
you bounce it and your brain records. You hold a physical apple for the first
time but not the last, you bite it, you taste it and you smell it and the brain
records. In unity with the suit you can now experience bouncing the ball within
the digital realm. Of course, we cannot and should not sustain a full emersion
into the digital realm. There would be minimum requirement of construction in
combination with genetically modifying biological structure of trees
(scale/mass) to grow into environments conducive to life (context we can occupy
and coexist within) – a living organism architecture that heals and weathers
with time. This would allow Earth a more natural state, creating a setting that
is less polluted.
Space_Risks: Radiation / Vacuum / Low atmospheric
pressure or none / Thermal Extremes / Proximity to Gravity Wells / Remoteness /
Socio psychology
Mindful of variables, an architect’s role is to help
conduct, design and coordinate all the specialist input (aerospace engineering,
technology, construction et al.) into one coherent and ergonomic
interpretation.
Ideas and innovation inspired and informed by nature
allowing praxis – tangible intervention:
- Micro-Building/Structure
- Transforming layout
- Air tight/mechanical-multifunctional laboratory
- Ergonomic & conducive to life + Efficient + Safe +
Self - Sustainable (cost effective)
- Structure with flex to absorb forces
Comments